Jojo Rabbit is the new film by Taika Waititi and takes place in Nazzi Germany towards the end of World War 2 and a young boy nicknamed Jojo (Roman Davis) is sent to a young Nazi camp but is injured meanwhile he imagines their leader (Taika himself) as his imaginary best friend but one day in his mother (Scarlett Johannsson) house he sees a Jewish girl named Elsa (Thomasin McKenzie) hiding in there.
Jojo Rabbit again was a movie I was very keen to see as I am a big fan of Mr Waititi’s work from Hunt for the Wilderpeople to Thor Ragnarok to his work on the Mandalorian series and this was a personal project for him to make so I was hoping that his winning streak would continue once again.
Sadly and it is so very sad to say this ends his winning streak in my mind as this movie for me was a big big disappointment but again before I go into that I want to talk about the good this movie has:
- Firstly there are some great performances here, both young Mr Davis and Ms McKenzie are very good in this movie and they play off each other very well, Mr Davis in particular for someone so young is so good carrying this movie on his little shoulders, Mr Waititi does a good job as the leader, Stephen Merchant has a very memorable role as an elite officer, Ms Johannsson is very good way better than in Marriage Story.
- Secondly there are some great moments in the film, firstly when Taika goes the full hog as the leader it works great, there are multiple scenes with JoJo and his Mum that are very good as well as between JoJo and Elsa that really do get to you emotionally.
But like with Bombshell this movie has a very inconsistent tone once again wanting you to look at this very serious subject while at the same time wanting to create these very broad laughs which has been a real strength of Mr Waititi’s work but here it just didn’t work for me one bit as I just couldn’t bring myself to laugh at this particular subject which for me personally is just too serious to create a sense of laughter at.
Now that isn’t to say you can’t have a light hearted and fun movie with that group in it, Raiders of the Lost Ark/Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and the Rocketeer are great examples of where you have fun light hearted adventures featuring them but not treating them like comedic farces whereas here characters like the ones Rebel Wilson, Sam Rockwell and Alfie Allen play are portrayed in a very comedic way and it really really bothered me.
I wanted to love Jojo Rabbit as Mr Waititi has not put a foot wrong to me prior to this but here he puts his face in the mud with this very ill judged comedy about Germany in World War 2 that just left a bad taste in my mouth and a bitter taste of disappointment once again, 1 out of 5.
Tuesday, February 4, 2020
Film Review - Bombshell (2020)
Bombshell is directed by Jay Roach and stars Charlize Theron as Megyn Kelly and Nicole Kidman as Gretchen Carlson, 2 top anchor people at the infamous Fox News TV network but when Carlson lodges a sexual harassment suit against its boss Roger Ailes (John Lithgow) the dominoes start to fall over at the network.
Bombshell was for me a bit of a disappointment movie wise but before I delve into that I want to go into the films clear strengths first among them is the makeup work, it does a great job helping to transform Ms Theron into Ms Kelly as well as Mr Lithgow as Mr Ailes and Malcolm McDowell into Rupert Murdoch despite his poor attempt at an Australian accent.
Those 3 people also give great performances in those roles in this movie, Ms Theron in particular shows confidence, skill and poise in her role and is very compelling to watch, Mr Lithgow a long time favorite of mine is also very good as is Mr McDowell despite that bad accent and I also enjoyed Ms Kate McKinnon in this movie who gives a great dramatic performance and I didn’t think she had it in her in all honesty, I hope she explores more of this side to her in the future.
But as for the movie itself like I mentioned above I was disappointed in it and its really due to the films tone, this movie wants to be serious minded about Sexual Harassment in a professional workplace and there is one scene with Margot Robbie that made me feel yuck in my mouth yet at the same time so much of this movie winks and nods to the camera and there’s a lot of voiceover narration and people talking directly down the barrel of the camera like in Deadpool and the Wolf of Wall Street and it really bothered me in a major way.
And it bothers me so because I wanted to feel that anger, that rage, that feeling of powerlessness to quote a big 2016 movie Batman V Superman and at that point in time in my own life I was still on Radio and I know how I would feel if it was one of them caught up in this, I would want the power of a Super Saiyan (the greatest power in the universe) flowing through my veins so I could tear those responsible limb from limb like Toppo does with Frieza or Trunks does to King Kold consequences be damned but instead all I felt was this mixed reaction and when I think about it in the cold light of day it feels disappointing.
And so that was Bombshell a movie I was very keen to see because of its subject matter and its cast but instead was a big disappointment despite some strong elements in it, 2 out of 5.
Bombshell was for me a bit of a disappointment movie wise but before I delve into that I want to go into the films clear strengths first among them is the makeup work, it does a great job helping to transform Ms Theron into Ms Kelly as well as Mr Lithgow as Mr Ailes and Malcolm McDowell into Rupert Murdoch despite his poor attempt at an Australian accent.
Those 3 people also give great performances in those roles in this movie, Ms Theron in particular shows confidence, skill and poise in her role and is very compelling to watch, Mr Lithgow a long time favorite of mine is also very good as is Mr McDowell despite that bad accent and I also enjoyed Ms Kate McKinnon in this movie who gives a great dramatic performance and I didn’t think she had it in her in all honesty, I hope she explores more of this side to her in the future.
But as for the movie itself like I mentioned above I was disappointed in it and its really due to the films tone, this movie wants to be serious minded about Sexual Harassment in a professional workplace and there is one scene with Margot Robbie that made me feel yuck in my mouth yet at the same time so much of this movie winks and nods to the camera and there’s a lot of voiceover narration and people talking directly down the barrel of the camera like in Deadpool and the Wolf of Wall Street and it really bothered me in a major way.
And it bothers me so because I wanted to feel that anger, that rage, that feeling of powerlessness to quote a big 2016 movie Batman V Superman and at that point in time in my own life I was still on Radio and I know how I would feel if it was one of them caught up in this, I would want the power of a Super Saiyan (the greatest power in the universe) flowing through my veins so I could tear those responsible limb from limb like Toppo does with Frieza or Trunks does to King Kold consequences be damned but instead all I felt was this mixed reaction and when I think about it in the cold light of day it feels disappointing.
And so that was Bombshell a movie I was very keen to see because of its subject matter and its cast but instead was a big disappointment despite some strong elements in it, 2 out of 5.
Saturday, January 18, 2020
Film Review - Bad Boys for Life (2020)
Bad Boys for Life is the third film in the series and stars Will Smith and Martin Lawrence once again as they deal with a mysterious group killing off people connected to the case that put their ring leader in prison so Smith and Lawrence must ride together one last time to save the day.
Bad Boys for Life is good fun and first off Mr Smith and Mr Lawrence have good chemistry together and watching them spar back and forth is good fun throughout the film, secondly Joe Pantoliano is great as the disgruntled police chief who chews them out for causing a mess and its nice to see him in a movie again.
Also I have to say that I love the little nod to the late Don Simpson who produced the first Bad Boys film in 1995 before sadly passing away a year later in 1996.
But special praise has to be given to the films directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, they did a great job directing the film in taking on Michael Bay’s style as much as possible while also not cutting every tenth of a second and slowing things down wherever possible and giving action fans some good old fashioned MA15 rated violence, these guys are currently lined up to direct Beverly Hills Cop 4 for Netflix and I hope that Eddie Murphy trusts these guys to do a good job as after this movie I am very keen to see what they do with Axel Foley provided Eddie trusts them enough to do it.
And so that was Bad Boys for Life and its good fun though its not the best action film you’ll see out there, 3 out of 5.
Bad Boys for Life is good fun and first off Mr Smith and Mr Lawrence have good chemistry together and watching them spar back and forth is good fun throughout the film, secondly Joe Pantoliano is great as the disgruntled police chief who chews them out for causing a mess and its nice to see him in a movie again.
Also I have to say that I love the little nod to the late Don Simpson who produced the first Bad Boys film in 1995 before sadly passing away a year later in 1996.
But special praise has to be given to the films directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, they did a great job directing the film in taking on Michael Bay’s style as much as possible while also not cutting every tenth of a second and slowing things down wherever possible and giving action fans some good old fashioned MA15 rated violence, these guys are currently lined up to direct Beverly Hills Cop 4 for Netflix and I hope that Eddie Murphy trusts these guys to do a good job as after this movie I am very keen to see what they do with Axel Foley provided Eddie trusts them enough to do it.
And so that was Bad Boys for Life and its good fun though its not the best action film you’ll see out there, 3 out of 5.
Film Review - Dolittle (2020)
Dolittle stars Robert Downey Jr as Dr Dolittle, a man who can walk with the animals, talk with the animals, laugh and squeak and squawk with the animals but who has gone into exile after his beloved wife dies at sea but when the Queen (Jesse Buckley from Wild Rose) falls ill he has to go on a dangerous journey to find a cure and save his animal sanctuary.
Dolittle is not the flaming pile of poo that other have said but its not far off it either, this movie for me is a regular pile of poo for these reasons:
- Firstly Robert Downey Jr one of the most likeable, charismatic actors on earth, the man who made us all cry with his sacrifice in Avengers Endgame last year is terrible in this, he talks so fast so quickly and does a variety of different accents at the same time that every time he opens his mouth it pulls you out of the film as you have no idea what on Earth he’s saying and I really really wish that someone had pulled him aside and said “Robert can you slow down please?” it would’ve made for a better performance I think.
- Secondly the journey is not a very fun one, the editing at times feels very choppy and it relies too much on Emma Thompson providing voiceover to tell us stuff that should have been a part of the movie in terms of said journey, the films humour falls very flat save for making a few kids laugh in my session and the tone of it feels off at times, it wants to be whimsical but also mournful about Dr Dolittle’s lost wife and plots to take over the crown of England.
Um Okay, why exactly couldn’t we have done without the faceless men trying to knife a leader and killing off the wife, this could’ve been fun and whimsical with cute animals and music and Chief Wiggum even.
I did however like Mr Michael Sheen as the villain, yes he’s snooty and dastardly but he at least is having some sort of fun with this role and he does try an awful lot to salvage something, anything out of this abominable mess of a movie.
Dolittle is sadly a turkey that the good doctor should have put down for its own good, its tonally off, has a bad lead performance and fails at giving people outside of young children a fun adventure with laughs to be had, poor Mr Sheen he really did try, 1.5 out of 5.
Dolittle is not the flaming pile of poo that other have said but its not far off it either, this movie for me is a regular pile of poo for these reasons:
- Firstly Robert Downey Jr one of the most likeable, charismatic actors on earth, the man who made us all cry with his sacrifice in Avengers Endgame last year is terrible in this, he talks so fast so quickly and does a variety of different accents at the same time that every time he opens his mouth it pulls you out of the film as you have no idea what on Earth he’s saying and I really really wish that someone had pulled him aside and said “Robert can you slow down please?” it would’ve made for a better performance I think.
- Secondly the journey is not a very fun one, the editing at times feels very choppy and it relies too much on Emma Thompson providing voiceover to tell us stuff that should have been a part of the movie in terms of said journey, the films humour falls very flat save for making a few kids laugh in my session and the tone of it feels off at times, it wants to be whimsical but also mournful about Dr Dolittle’s lost wife and plots to take over the crown of England.
Um Okay, why exactly couldn’t we have done without the faceless men trying to knife a leader and killing off the wife, this could’ve been fun and whimsical with cute animals and music and Chief Wiggum even.
I did however like Mr Michael Sheen as the villain, yes he’s snooty and dastardly but he at least is having some sort of fun with this role and he does try an awful lot to salvage something, anything out of this abominable mess of a movie.
Dolittle is sadly a turkey that the good doctor should have put down for its own good, its tonally off, has a bad lead performance and fails at giving people outside of young children a fun adventure with laughs to be had, poor Mr Sheen he really did try, 1.5 out of 5.
Saturday, January 11, 2020
Film Review - 1917 (2020)
1917 is the new film by Sam Mendes who made Skyfall and Spectre the 2 previous James Bond films but this movie takes place in April 1917 where 2 young soldiers (George Mackay and Dean Charles-Chapman) must make a treacherous journey behind enemy lines to prevent an attack on enemy territory that will end in a massacre of 1600 soldiers but the journey will prove perilous for our young soldiers.
1917 is very very well crafted and at the top of that list is Mr Mendes himself, he directs the film to look like it was all done in one long continuous take and for the vast majority of the film this technique works very well and along with cinematographer Roger Deakins crafts a very immersive experience that is well worth seeing on the big screen with a good sound system, one sequence in a bombed out town at night is particularly good and on more than one occasion I was on the edge of my seat watching every frame to see if they would find the enemy or a mine or a gunshot from afar it works that well.
The 2 young actors Mr Mackay and Mr Charles-Chapman are also very good in the film, they are asked to carry a lot of this movie and they pull it off very well especially Mr Mackay who really steps up to the plate and does a great job while the 2 young actors rattle off stories to each other in a way that never feels boring to watch, there are also some great cameos by Mr Colin Firth, Mark Strong, Andrew Scott and Benedict Cumberbatch in small scenes.
If I have a complaint about this movie however I have to say that the one continuous shot trick does start to wear a little thin once you get to the end of the film and as a result the film as a whole starts to feel a little long at nearly 2 hours whereas Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk was only 107 minutes and the film was stronger for it in that it didn’t let its time bending techniques overstay its welcome and also the one continuous take approach at times made me think I’m watching Call of Duty: 1917 where you walk around the levels and explore every nook and cranny to find something useful and look it creates an immersive experience a lot of the time but there were times where it felt like a video game.
And so that was 1917 a film that is well worth watching on the big screen but one that I was happy to watch once but not go back to in a big hurry, 3 and a half out of 5.
1917 is very very well crafted and at the top of that list is Mr Mendes himself, he directs the film to look like it was all done in one long continuous take and for the vast majority of the film this technique works very well and along with cinematographer Roger Deakins crafts a very immersive experience that is well worth seeing on the big screen with a good sound system, one sequence in a bombed out town at night is particularly good and on more than one occasion I was on the edge of my seat watching every frame to see if they would find the enemy or a mine or a gunshot from afar it works that well.
The 2 young actors Mr Mackay and Mr Charles-Chapman are also very good in the film, they are asked to carry a lot of this movie and they pull it off very well especially Mr Mackay who really steps up to the plate and does a great job while the 2 young actors rattle off stories to each other in a way that never feels boring to watch, there are also some great cameos by Mr Colin Firth, Mark Strong, Andrew Scott and Benedict Cumberbatch in small scenes.
If I have a complaint about this movie however I have to say that the one continuous shot trick does start to wear a little thin once you get to the end of the film and as a result the film as a whole starts to feel a little long at nearly 2 hours whereas Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk was only 107 minutes and the film was stronger for it in that it didn’t let its time bending techniques overstay its welcome and also the one continuous take approach at times made me think I’m watching Call of Duty: 1917 where you walk around the levels and explore every nook and cranny to find something useful and look it creates an immersive experience a lot of the time but there were times where it felt like a video game.
And so that was 1917 a film that is well worth watching on the big screen but one that I was happy to watch once but not go back to in a big hurry, 3 and a half out of 5.
Thursday, January 9, 2020
Film Review - The Gentlemen (2020)
The Gentlemen is directed by Guy Ritchie and concerns Raymond (Charlie Hunnam) the number 2 man to Mickey (Matthew McConaughey) and his drug empire but one night he is visited by a reporter (Hugh Grant) who knows about his operation and wants to know more while also telling him a story about it at the same time.
The Gentlemen is a fun movie that has an awful lot of coarse language in it which more than justifies its MA rating so those who don’t like that sort of thing would be best to skip this movie especially as there is multiple uses of the C word in the film but it didn’t bother me I enjoyed the language and the violence for the most part and it was nice to see Mr Ritchie go back to his Lock Stock/Snatch roots though he made those films with Matthew Vaughn and Mr Vaughn was clearly the better of the two there.
Also the cast is here to play and it shows, Mr Grant continues his good fortune after his great turn in Paddington 2 as the villain and is good fun here, I enjoyed seeing Mr Hunnam in this movie though he very much plays a support act here while Mr McConaughey also does a good job as the seasoned man who wants the quiet life while Mr Henry Golding, Eddie Marsan, Colin Farrell and Jeremy Strong are fun and enjoyable in their roles as well.
Though I have to give a special shout out to Ms Michelle Dockery who yes plays the standard Gangster’s Moll character but plays it very well that every time she came on screen I really enjoyed every moment she was on it plus there is a very cool play on the F word that had me laughing the most in this movie.
If I have one complaint though I have to say that the story does get a little too twisty turny at times in terms of who’s where and what’s what and who’s trying to do what and who all the players are and their allegiances changing sometimes that becomes very hard to follow while your watching it and while it doesn’t make the film overall feel like a mess it does knock it down a peg or two for me.
And so that was the Gentlemen and it’s a fun time in the Summer Movie calendar that won’t become a big favorite but you’ll have fun for 2 hours nonetheless, 3 out of 5.
The Gentlemen is a fun movie that has an awful lot of coarse language in it which more than justifies its MA rating so those who don’t like that sort of thing would be best to skip this movie especially as there is multiple uses of the C word in the film but it didn’t bother me I enjoyed the language and the violence for the most part and it was nice to see Mr Ritchie go back to his Lock Stock/Snatch roots though he made those films with Matthew Vaughn and Mr Vaughn was clearly the better of the two there.
Also the cast is here to play and it shows, Mr Grant continues his good fortune after his great turn in Paddington 2 as the villain and is good fun here, I enjoyed seeing Mr Hunnam in this movie though he very much plays a support act here while Mr McConaughey also does a good job as the seasoned man who wants the quiet life while Mr Henry Golding, Eddie Marsan, Colin Farrell and Jeremy Strong are fun and enjoyable in their roles as well.
Though I have to give a special shout out to Ms Michelle Dockery who yes plays the standard Gangster’s Moll character but plays it very well that every time she came on screen I really enjoyed every moment she was on it plus there is a very cool play on the F word that had me laughing the most in this movie.
If I have one complaint though I have to say that the story does get a little too twisty turny at times in terms of who’s where and what’s what and who’s trying to do what and who all the players are and their allegiances changing sometimes that becomes very hard to follow while your watching it and while it doesn’t make the film overall feel like a mess it does knock it down a peg or two for me.
And so that was the Gentlemen and it’s a fun time in the Summer Movie calendar that won’t become a big favorite but you’ll have fun for 2 hours nonetheless, 3 out of 5.
Film Review - Little Women (2020)
Little Women is based off of the novel but this time Greta Gerwig who wrote and directed Lady Bird steps into both roles in adapting the book and directing the film, the story concerns the life of the March sisters Jo (Saiorise Ronan), Amy (Florence Pugh), Beth (Eliza Scanlen) and Meg (Emma Watson) as they go through life in civil war era America with all the ups and downs they bring.
I was very keen for this movie mainly due to Ms Gerwig taking it on, I really liked Lady Bird in early 2018 and was keen to see what she would do next but Little Women had already been adapted by Gillian Armstrong in 1995 with a great cast all its own so could this movie do a good job or would it just sit in the shadow of the Armstrong film.
Well this is definitely a new and fresh take on this material and I adored it, watching this movie felt like someone giving me a great big hug the entire time and there are some reasons why:
- Firstly I have to talk about Ms Gerwig’s direction and scripting here, the way she adapts this story is a very fresh and modern take that plays around with the overall structure of the story itself but it really makes the storytelling and characters feel real and relevant to the entirety of the film instead of Jo just dominating everyone and the other Sisters falling into the background that is not the case here each of them get story arcs all their own and it really makes the film come alive.
As for her direction its pretty good but I thought her direction in Lady Bird was better as watching that film I felt this strong, powerful voice emerge in a way that felt confident, assured and ready to roar with all its might whereas here the direction really serves to highlight how well the book was adapted for a new generation and honing in on the idea of owning your story which I really loved.
- Secondly the performances here are wonderful, Ms Ronan for someone so young has given one great performance after another and that is no exception here her Jo is someone that you can’t help but fall in love with she’s warm, feisty, wears her heart on her sleeve and reminds me now that I think about it of Belle from Beauty and the Beast someone who wants so much more to this provincial life even if it feels somewhat out of reach.
Ms Pugh as Amy continues her good work and makes what could have been a very unlikeable character someone who you can watch and understand, Ms Scanlen is good as Beth as well while Ms Watson finally gets to shed the Hermione Granger typecasting I feel has shadowed her since the Harry Potter films and I really enjoyed that.
As for the other performances Mr Timothee Chalamet is pretty good as Laurie though at times he comes across as a bit of a dick, Meryl Streep and Laura Dern who you either love in movies or you don’t are very good here while I also enjoyed Mr Chris Cooper in his small role though I also loved seeing Mr Tracy Letts again after loving his work as Henry Ford the second in Ford V Ferrari last year.
- And lastly there is some great craftsmanship on show here mainly Nick Houy’s editing and Alexandre Desplat’s score, the editing work here does a great job of not letting the non linear structure run away from Ms Gerwig which it does have a habit of doing at times under Mr Christopher Nolan while Mr Desplat’s score feels very classical but also modern at the same time and it really highlights the film well.
And so that was Little Women and after the bitter disappointment of Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker this movie with its warm cuddle was the perfect tonic, its warm, sad, heartfelt and I adored every moment of it, 4 and a half out of 5.
I was very keen for this movie mainly due to Ms Gerwig taking it on, I really liked Lady Bird in early 2018 and was keen to see what she would do next but Little Women had already been adapted by Gillian Armstrong in 1995 with a great cast all its own so could this movie do a good job or would it just sit in the shadow of the Armstrong film.
Well this is definitely a new and fresh take on this material and I adored it, watching this movie felt like someone giving me a great big hug the entire time and there are some reasons why:
- Firstly I have to talk about Ms Gerwig’s direction and scripting here, the way she adapts this story is a very fresh and modern take that plays around with the overall structure of the story itself but it really makes the storytelling and characters feel real and relevant to the entirety of the film instead of Jo just dominating everyone and the other Sisters falling into the background that is not the case here each of them get story arcs all their own and it really makes the film come alive.
As for her direction its pretty good but I thought her direction in Lady Bird was better as watching that film I felt this strong, powerful voice emerge in a way that felt confident, assured and ready to roar with all its might whereas here the direction really serves to highlight how well the book was adapted for a new generation and honing in on the idea of owning your story which I really loved.
- Secondly the performances here are wonderful, Ms Ronan for someone so young has given one great performance after another and that is no exception here her Jo is someone that you can’t help but fall in love with she’s warm, feisty, wears her heart on her sleeve and reminds me now that I think about it of Belle from Beauty and the Beast someone who wants so much more to this provincial life even if it feels somewhat out of reach.
Ms Pugh as Amy continues her good work and makes what could have been a very unlikeable character someone who you can watch and understand, Ms Scanlen is good as Beth as well while Ms Watson finally gets to shed the Hermione Granger typecasting I feel has shadowed her since the Harry Potter films and I really enjoyed that.
As for the other performances Mr Timothee Chalamet is pretty good as Laurie though at times he comes across as a bit of a dick, Meryl Streep and Laura Dern who you either love in movies or you don’t are very good here while I also enjoyed Mr Chris Cooper in his small role though I also loved seeing Mr Tracy Letts again after loving his work as Henry Ford the second in Ford V Ferrari last year.
- And lastly there is some great craftsmanship on show here mainly Nick Houy’s editing and Alexandre Desplat’s score, the editing work here does a great job of not letting the non linear structure run away from Ms Gerwig which it does have a habit of doing at times under Mr Christopher Nolan while Mr Desplat’s score feels very classical but also modern at the same time and it really highlights the film well.
And so that was Little Women and after the bitter disappointment of Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker this movie with its warm cuddle was the perfect tonic, its warm, sad, heartfelt and I adored every moment of it, 4 and a half out of 5.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
